Skip to main content

Major Change of Ideas

Edit: April Fool's. The article completely fails to answer for the benefits of math and science (including medicine and natural disaster prediction). It grossly exaggerates the negative aspects of math and science. Incidentally, math and science have made a large positive difference in my life.

Good morning, everybody! I decided to write a blog post to say that I will be completely changing the way I view knowledge and the purpose of life.
A horse ranch
Photo credit: my sister
Basically, "higher" knowledge (including logic, science, mathematics, etc.) is completely useless. There is no point in learning these subjects, which is why I have dropped all my college classes and will not be going to school today.

Instead, we should go to the fields, with a shovel and a rake, and grow crops. I will therefore end my blog and begin life as a worker at a ranch in Wyoming.


Why this sudden change, you might ask? A few days after my last post (which nobody seemed to read), I came upon a realization that, so far, my knowledge of math, science, and technology has brought me nowhere.

What I have learned has not helped me to lose weight, or gain pounds, or earn extra money, or earn anybody's respect, or become famous, or save any lives, or change any lives, or even solve any problems (besides those at the end of every Chemistry chapter). In other words, knowledge has made no positive difference in my life.

It has made no positive difference in anybody else's life, either.

Let's look at what math has done for us. Among other things, it has:
  1. Tortured students in schools
  2. Discriminated against less intelligent individuals (despite our belief that all men were created equal)
  3. Stolen hours of people's time
  4. Confused even the people who think they understand it
  5. And worst of all, caused people to combine irrationality with imagination
Clearly a negative impact. And the same goes for science and logic. The sciences are like illegal drugs - they result in a distorted worldview and cause serious damage.

Think of the Challenger and Columbia space shuttle accidents, for example. These disasters that resulted from the application of math and science. Same with the Virgin Galactic SpaceShip2 accident. Or look at what happened on 9-11-2001 in the U.S., with the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

People call them accidents and disasters, as if they were mistakes, but it all boils down to our use of math and science. Without our advanced knowledge of math and science, none of these things would have happened.

In contrast, manual labor has brought us food, clothing, and warm shelters. While astronomers stare at the sky and chemists play with chemicals, farmers are harvesting crops and ranchers are fattening their pigs and their cattle.

There are no negative aspects of an agricultural lifestyle, except where science has interfered by introducing toxic pesticides and fertilizers. Pure agriculture is only beneficial to society.

It boils down to a very simple observation: farmers feed us while scientists blow us to pieces. Which is worth more?

The answer should be obvious.


New posts every month - subscribe for free!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dividing Paper Puzzle

When I was young, I would fold a sheet of letter paper in half, for origami projects. It occurred to me that the two halves looked almost the same as the whole sheet of paper - except they were smaller. I could see they weren't exactly the same shape; they were off by a little bit. But the idea stuck in my head. You can use a pen, instead of scissors, to halve the paper. Those rectangles all have the same shape, but are different sizes. One night when I was 12, I thought about my idea. I wondered if it was possible to have a sheet of paper that could be cut in half, resulting in 2 smaller versions of the same paper. That would be neat, to be able to cut a paper in half and get 2 papers that had the same exact shape. If that were possible, then you could cut  those  papers, too; and the resulting papers would have the same shape as all the other papers. You could keep cutting in half forever, and each paper, no matter how small, would have the same shape as all the others. I HAD to

Pluto No Longer on the Horizon

This morning, New Horizons became the first spacecraft to make a flyby observation of the Pluto system. During the mission, the spacecraft captured the most detailed photographs of Pluto's surface we've ever had, and possibly ever will have. It also found many new properties including size, mass, atmosphere, and surface composition. In a period of a few hours, we discovered more about Pluto than we've found in the 85 years since Clyde Tombaugh captured its first photograph. Before After  (images credit: NASA) To complete this mission, the spacecraft flew for more than 9 years through the emptiness of space. This may sound like a long time, but it's actually amazingly quick. In fact, New Horizons set the record for the fastest speed at launch, and during the flyby, the spacecraft was moving at a rate of over 30,000 mph, or roughly 50 times the speed of sound. Picture an object twice as heavy as a grand piano moving 25 times faster than a bullet from a gun. Yikes. The man

Gravity

Imagine the universe is filled with water. Instead of empty space, every inch of it contains pure water. No planets, no stars, only water. What happens? And what would happen if an air bubble formed? The answer to this question requires a basic understanding of gravity. Gravity is very important. It helps hold matter together, bends light, and distorts space-time (which, incidentally, is how it bends light). It also makes it possible to play football, and as Americans are big football fans, they would certainly agree that we couldn't live without it. Unfortunately, many Americans don't understand how gravity works. Admittedly, scientists haven't figured out a lot of things, but we do understand it well enough to make predictions and model physical events. One of the important things about gravity is that its strength is proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance. In other words, it gets weaker as you get farther away, based on the equation: F = c/d 2 where c