Skip to main content

Visualizing Time: An Essay

If time were stopped, would this falling pen look blurry to us?
Time can be a very confusing subject. It has a past, a present, and a future, but the future keeps changing and the present is always moving, while the past grows larger. Although most people think they understand time, they often get confused when they try to describe it. To help visualize and understand time, many people compare it to a very familiar concept: a line.

This line, called a timeline, represents time as a whole. The current moment, or the present, is a single point which moves smoothly along the timeline. The part of the timeline behind the point is the past, and the part ahead of the point represents the future. The whole timeline, including the moving point that represents the present, is considered exactly the same for everyone. Although this whole approach may be a useful way to represent time, it is actually inaccurate in describing time.

First of all, the present does not have to be experienced in the same way for everyone. In many science fiction films, including Star Trek: The Voyage Home, the characters time travel to different time periods using various methods such as high velocity. Time travel may not seem possible, but according to Einstein's general theory of relativity, it actually is.

According to Einstein's theory, objects in a strong gravitational field experience time more quickly than objects in a weak gravitational field; this effect, called "time dilation," has been supported experimentally, and even has to be regarded when synchronizing the clocks on GPS satellites (1). In fact, the first GPS satellite was designed without regarding time dilation, and within hours the satellite was noticeably out of sync with clocks on earth.

Due to time dilation, if two people were both experiencing the same point on the timeline, one person could be placed in a high-gravity environment so that he would experience time faster than the other. He would then move more quickly along the timeline than the other person, effectively moving into the future until he is experiencing a different period of time than the other person. Therefore, the present is not necessarily the same universally, and is unique to each person experiencing it.

Furthermore, the present should be represented by a line at least 23 milliseconds long on the timeline, not a single point. It should be represented this way because humans perceive and experience multiple points of time simultaneously, due to their imperfect sensory processing, which not only blurs periods of time together but also delays perception time by varying amounts.

According to a study published by Michael Barnett-Cowan, PhD, and Laurence R. Harris, PhD, the perception time for a visual stimulus is 220 milliseconds, while the perception time for an auditory stimulus is 197 milliseconds (2). This means that a person would visually experience one point in time while simultaneously experiencing sound that occurred 23 milliseconds earlier.  Because the present is defined by a person experiencing it, the present should be represented by a period of at least 23 milliseconds on the timeline, rather than a specific point on the timeline, because that is the minimum range that each person experiences at a given time.

Even if humans had perfect senses, the present moment would still need to be represented as a small line on the timeline, not a single point. It should be represented this way because time has a smallest possible length. The smallest possible length of time, called the Planck time, is defined as the amount of time it takes for light to travel a distance of one Planck length, which is believed to be the shortest possible distance. Because nothing can travel faster than light, no event can happen in less than one Planck time (3). Admittedly, because the Planck time is such a short period of time, it would still be somewhat accurate to represent the present with a single point; however, it is more accurate to use a line of at least one Planck time in length.

To summarize, the commonly accepted model for time is incorrect; time is not universal, and the current moment cannot be accurately represented with a single point. In reality, time is different for every person, and the current moment is an interval of at least 23 milliseconds. This new model will seem a little strange to most people; it is certainly difficult to accept after living with the old one for so long. But it is probably the closest the average person will ever get to making sense of the mystery of time.


REFERENCES:

 1. Barnett-Cowan, Michael, and Laurence R. Harris. "Perceived Timing Of Vestibular Stimulation Relative To Touch, Light And Sound." Experimental Brain Research 198 (2009): 221-31. Print.

2. "Planck Time." Cosmos. Swinburne University of Technology, n.d. Web. Accessed 19 Sept. 2014. <http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/P/Planck%2BTime>.

3. Wolfson, Richard. Simply Einstein: Reality Demystified. 1st ed. New York: W.W. Norton, 2003.

To receive updates, subscribe now!


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Flipping Quarters

Here's an interesting puzzle involving chance: A man in a park asks you to play a game with him. It's a form of gambling. To play, you must pay the man $5, then flip a coin repeatedly until you get heads. As soon as you get heads, you stop flipping. If you only flipped the quarter once, he'll give you $1. If you flipped it twice, you get $2. Three times, $4. Four times, $8. Each extra flip gets you twice as much money, so the longer it takes before you get tails, the more money you get. Should you play, if you have a lot of time and the man will play as many games as you want? How much money, on average, would you gain (subtracting the $5 fee)? I will give the solution in a later post .
1 comment
Read more

Pluto No Longer on the Horizon

This morning, New Horizons became the first spacecraft to make a flyby observation of the Pluto system. During the mission, the spacecraft captured the most detailed photographs of Pluto's surface we've ever had, and possibly ever will have. It also found many new properties including size, mass, atmosphere, and surface composition. In a period of a few hours, we discovered more about Pluto than we've found in the 85 years since Clyde Tombaugh captured its first photograph. Before After  (images credit: NASA) To complete this mission, the spacecraft flew for more than 9 years through the emptiness of space. This may sound like a long time, but it's actually amazingly quick. In fact, New Horizons set the record for the fastest speed at launch, and during the flyby, the spacecraft was moving at a rate of over 30,000 mph, or roughly 50 times the speed of sound. Picture an object twice as heavy as a grand piano moving 25 times faster than a bullet from a gun. Yikes. The man...
2 comments
Read more

Should Tau Replace Pi?

The digits of π, organized in a very new way Happy π-day! And happy π-month! Today's month and day - that is, March 14 or 3.14 - includes the first 3 digits of π. And today's month and year - March 2014 or 3.14 - also includes the first 3 digits of π. We won't have another double-day for π for the next 100 years, so enjoy this one! For the special occasion, I'm posting two π-related posts - one for π-month, and the other for π-day. In both posts, I'm setting the font size to approximately π * π + π + π. This is the first post, for π-month; to see the second, go to http://greatmst.blogspot.com/2014/03/pi-month-pi-day-post-2-5-common-pi-myths.html . In this post, I am including an essay I wrote about whether π or τ is the more superior constant. This was written for people who know very little about math, so the basic idea should be easy to understand even for people who are not mathematically inclined. Should Tau Replace Pi? A constant is any number or value that ne...
Post a Comment
Read more